Skip to main content


Pollan carefully criticizes science throughout In Defense of Food. Primarily his criticism is of reductionism. Pollan points out that reductionism has led us to investigate the parts rather than the whole. We look at nutrients rather than whole foods when interested in the mechanics of health. I believe this is an important observation and one that probably ought to help us recognize that we must view eating as a complex system. It would probably be unwise, however, to view this important observation as a reason for a wholesale retreat from reductionism. Certainly, most of the arguments in favor of a whole foods diet and rejecting a processed diet in this text are based on reductionist claims. It is very difficult to investigate a mechanism without reductionist methodology. Perhaps Pollan is just suggesting we recognize the limits of reductionist methodology. It is important, however, to recognize the limits of correlations as well. It is impossible to compare the health of people who eat western foods with those that do not, because those people differ in many other ways as well. Even studies of those who ate a non-western diet and then adopted a western diet, are also studying a people who have adopted a western way of life as well. I do not doubt myself that diet is a key component in this correlation, but we must recognize the limits of the inquiry. Perhaps the best inquiries consider parts in context and draw on the strengths of several ways of knowing to answer questions. Pollan has done just this in, In Defense of Food. Thus, I am left with the impression that interdisciplinary collaboration rather than interdisciplinary criticism will have the most profound impact on the way we come to address the problems we face today.

18 thoughts on “Reductionist?

  1. I agree- its an impossibility to compare those on Western and Asian diets unless using a controlled group which would be very difficult.
    I do see many Asians now living in NZ, and adopting a more western diet carrying more weight than their counterparts living back in Asia

  2. Excellent post. This was actually what I was looking for,
    and I am glad that I finally came here! This for sharing and keep up the good work…
    thanks for this nice article Good post…..Valuable information for all.

  3. I agree that it is not only what you eat, but the quality that is important, especially for weight loss. If we all halved the amount we eat each day I'm sure that it would be adequate for our nutritional needs.

  4. I think the diet is a direct correlation, but you hit the nail on the head when you said it's impossible to compare the health of people who eat western foods with those who don't and how people are very different.

  5. I totally agree with Pollan and your view on reductionism in today's diet. Western foods are necessary in the fast paced life we live, especially if people continue to share a mindset of indifference towards the food they eat. Adopting a different, more european food culture may help in different ways.
    Thanks for the post it was a great read for being fairly short!

  6. Hello Vincent,
    Yup you are right whether we are adopting western good or not we are just trying to see the nutrition value not the whole food. I liked the content and enjoyed as well because Food is the topic which anyone can enjoy easily.